To the top

Page Manager: Webmaster
Last update: 9/11/2012 3:13 PM

Tell a friend about this page
Print version

New generation EU directi… - University of Gothenburg, Sweden Till startsida
Sitemap
To content Read more about how we use cookies on gu.se

Contact form








 


Note! If you want an answer on a question you must specify your email address




New generation EU directives, sustainability, and the role of transnational coordination in Baltic Sea maritime spatial planning

Journal article
Authors B. Hassler
N. Blazauskas
K. Gee
A. Luttmann
Andrea Morf
J. Piwowarczyk
F. Saunders
I. Stalmokaite
Helena Strand
J. Zaucha
Published in Ocean & Coastal Management
Volume 169
Pages 254-263
ISSN 0964-5691
Publication year 2019
Published at Swedish Institute for the Marine Environment
Pages 254-263
Language en
Links dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2018...
Keywords Baltic sea, Sustainability, Ecosystem approach, Context-dependence, Transnational integration, Oceanography, Water Resources
Subject categories European law, Oceanography

Abstract

The EU MSP Directive is an example of a so-called new generation directive, which gives Member States room for adaptation to national contexts. The main objective in this article is to identify and analyse potential obstacles to effective and efficient planning caused by the diversity among national MSP frameworks that the Directive's broad regulatory boundaries have led to. It is shown that planning approaches can differ substantially between neighbouring countries, which can make it challenging to coordinate across national borders. Divergence between national MSP frameworks can also emerge from how political, jurisdictional and, administrative systems and traditions are organised in different Member States. It is shown that neighbouring countries can diverge substantially in how the ecological, economic and social dimensions of sustainability are balanced, which can make transnational coordination challenging. Furthermore, it is shown that stakeholder consultations differ among Member States in terms of, for example, who were invited, how the consultations were undertaken, and the role they play in relation to political decision-making. Because of these, and other differences in how MSP frameworks are being developed in the Member States, it is suggested that regional integration should be promoted with discretion. From this perspective, it seems reasonable to embrace diversity, while simultaneously promoting the adaptive management of coordination problems at lower levels, when, or if, they emerge or can be foreseen. Thus, increased integration of national MSP frameworks should be viewed as an instrument to reduce concrete efficiency losses, rather than as an intrinsic good.

Page Manager: Webmaster|Last update: 9/11/2012
Share:

The University of Gothenburg uses cookies to provide you with the best possible user experience. By continuing on this website, you approve of our use of cookies.  What are cookies?