To the top

Page Manager: Webmaster
Last update: 9/11/2012 3:13 PM

Tell a friend about this page
Print version

Complications, patient-re… - University of Gothenburg, Sweden Till startsida
Sitemap
To content Read more about how we use cookies on gu.se

Complications, patient-reported outcomes, and aesthetic results in immediate breast reconstruction with a dermal sling: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Journal article
Authors Christian Jepsen
Håkan Hallberg
Aldina Pivodic
Anna Elander
Emma Hansson
Published in Journal of plastic, reconstructive & aesthetic surgery : JPRAS
Volume 72
Issue 3
Pages 369-80
ISSN 1878-0539
Publication year 2019
Published at Institute of Clinical Sciences, Department of Plastic Surgery
Pages 369-80
Language en
Links dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bjps.2018.12.0...
www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.f...
Subject categories Plastic surgery

Abstract

An inferior dermal flap ("sling") can be used to cover an implant with two layers of tissue following Wise pattern skin-reducing mastectomies. Here, we performed a systematic review of the risks and benefits of this technique, specifically regarding complications, patient-reported outcomes, and aesthetic outcomes. PubMed and other relevant databases were searched using specific key words, with inclusion criteria comprising studies of dermal sling use involving ≥ 5 patients and performance according to the PICO framework. A meta-analysis was performed using a random-effects model involving a binomial distribution with logit-link function. For each study, the 95% confidence interval (CI) was obtained based on exact limits from a binomial distribution, and heterogeneity testing was performed using a chi-squared test. A total of 428 abstracts were retrieved, with 24 studies meeting the inclusion criteria and including a total of 879 patients and 1184 reconstructed breasts. The mean complication rate was 21.6% (95% CI: 16.9-27.2%), with the most common complication involving wound-healing problems (mean, 11.4%; 95% CI: 8.5-15.2%), and the frequency of implant loss (< 3 months) varied from 0% to 14% (mean, 2.2%; 95% CI: 1.1-4.4%). Seven articles reported patient-reported outcomes, and four reported aesthetic outcomes, with the quality of evidence classified as low for complications and very low for patient-reported outcomes and aesthetic outcomes. Our findings showed that although implant-based reconstruction with a dermal sling is widely used, there is little scientific evidence supporting the method.

Page Manager: Webmaster|Last update: 9/11/2012
Share:

The University of Gothenburg uses cookies to provide you with the best possible user experience. By continuing on this website, you approve of our use of cookies.  What are cookies?

Denna text är utskriven från följande webbsida:
http://gu.se/english/research/publication/?languageId=100001&disableRedirect=true&returnUrl=http%3A%2F%2Fgu.se%2Fforskning%2Fpublikation%2F%3FtipFriend%3Dtrue%26tipUrl%3Dhttp%253A%252F%252Fgu.se%252Fforskning%252Fpublikation%252F%253Fprint%253Dtrue%2526publicationId%253D277568%26print%3Dtrue%26publicationId%3D277568&tipFriend=true&tipUrl=http%3A%2F%2Fgu.se%2Fforskning%2Fpublikation%2F%3Fprint%3Dtrue%26publicationId%3D277568&publicationId=277568
Utskriftsdatum: 2020-03-31