To the top

Page Manager: Webmaster
Last update: 9/11/2012 3:13 PM

Tell a friend about this page
Print version

Percutaneous versus trans… - University of Gothenburg, Sweden Till startsida
Sitemap
To content Read more about how we use cookies on gu.se

Percutaneous versus transcutaneous bone conduction implant system: a feasibility study on a cadaver head.

Journal article
Authors Bo Håkansson
Måns Eeg-Olofsson
Sabine Reinfeldt
Stefan Stenfelt
Gösta Granström
Published in Otology & neurotology : official publication of the American Otological Society, American Neurotology Society [and] European Academy of Otology and Neurotology
Volume 29
Issue 8
Pages 1132-9
ISSN 1537-4505
Publication year 2008
Published at Institute of Clinical Sciences
Pages 1132-9
Language en
Links dx.doi.org/10.1097/MAO.0b013e31816f...
Keywords Implantable bone conduction hearing aid
Subject categories Otoneurology

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Percutaneous bone-anchored hearing aid (BAHA) is an important rehabilitation alternative for patients who have conductive or mixed hearing loss. However, these devices use a percutaneous and bone-anchored implant that has some drawbacks reported. A transcutaneous bone conduction implant system (BCI) is proposed as an alternative to the percutaneous system because it leaves the skin intact. The BCI transmits the signal to a permanently implanted transducer with an induction loop system through the intact skin. The aim of this study was to compare the electroacoustic performance of the BAHA Classic-300 with a full-scale BCI on a cadaver head in a sound field. The BCI comprised the audio processor of the vibrant sound bridge connected to a balanced vibration transducer (balanced electromagnetic separation transducer). METHODS: Implants with snap abutments were placed in the parietal bone (Classic-300) and 15-mm deep in the temporal bone (BCI). The vibration responses at the ipsilateral and contralateral cochlear promontories were measured with a laser Doppler vibrometer, with the beam aimed through the ear canal. RESULTS: Results show that the BCI produces approximately 5 dB higher maximum output level and has a slightly lower distortion than the Classic-300 at the ipsilateral promontorium at speech frequencies. At the contralateral promontorium, the maximum output level was considerably lower for the BCI than for the Classic-300 except in the 1-2 kHz range, where it was similar. CONCLUSION: Present results support the proposal that a BCI system can be a realistic alternative to a BAHA.

Page Manager: Webmaster|Last update: 9/11/2012
Share:

The University of Gothenburg uses cookies to provide you with the best possible user experience. By continuing on this website, you approve of our use of cookies.  What are cookies?

Denna text är utskriven från följande webbsida:
http://gu.se/english/research/publication/?publicationId=89598
Utskriftsdatum: 2020-08-14