To the top

Page Manager: Webmaster
Last update: 9/11/2012 3:13 PM

Tell a friend about this page
Print version

The use of multiple sites… - University of Gothenburg, Sweden Till startsida
Sitemap
To content Read more about how we use cookies on gu.se

The use of multiple sites for the diagnosis of osteoporosis.

Journal article
Authors J A Kanis
O Johnell
Anders Odén
Helena Johansson
J A Eisman
S Fujiwara
H Kroger
R Honkanen
L J Melton
T O'Neill
J Reeve
A Silman
A Tenenhouse
Published in Osteoporosis international
Volume 17
Issue 4
Pages 527-34
ISSN 0937-941X
Publication year 2006
Published at Institute of Medicine, School of Public Health and Community Medicine
Department of Mathematical Sciences, Mathematical Statistics
Pages 527-34
Language en
Links dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00198-005-0014-...
Keywords Absorptiometry, Photon, Aged, Bone Density, Female, Femur Neck, radiography, Fractures, Bone, diagnosis, Hip Fractures, diagnosis, Humans, Lumbar Vertebrae, radiography, Male, Middle Aged, Osteoporosis, diagnosis, Prospective Studies, Risk
Subject categories Clinical physiology, Endocrinology

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: It has been suggested that bone mineral density (BMD) measurements should be made at multiple sites, and that the lowest T-score should be taken for the purpose of diagnosing osteoporosis. PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to examine the use of BMD measurements at the femoral neck and lumbar spine alone and in combination for fracture prediction. METHODS: We studied 19,071 individuals (68% women) from six prospective population-based cohorts in whom BMD was measured at both sites and fracture outcomes documented over 73,499 patient years. BMD values were converted to Z-scores, and the gradient of risk for any osteoporotic fracture and for hip fracture was examined by using a Poisson model in each cohort and each gender separately. Results of the different studies were merged using weighted beta-coefficients. RESULTS: The gradients of risk for osteoporotic fracture and for hip fracture were similar in men and women. In men and women combined, the risk of any osteoporotic fracture increased by 1.51 [95% confidence interval (CI)=1.42-1.61] per standard deviation (SD) decrease in femoral-neck BMD. For measurements made at the lumbar spine, the gradient of risk was 1.47 (95% CI=1.38-1.56). Where the minimum of the two values was used, the gradient of risk was similar (1.55; 95% CI=1.45-1.64). Higher gradients of risk were observed for hip fracture outcomes: with BMD at the femoral neck, the gradient of risk was 2.45 (95% CI=2.10-2.87), with lumbar BMD was 1.57 (95% CI=1.36-1.82), and with the minimum value of either femoral neck and lumbar spine was 2.11 (95% CI=1.81-2.45). Thus, selecting the lowest value for BMD at either the femoral neck or lumbar spine did not increase the predictive ability of BMD tests. By contrast, the sensitivity increased so that more individuals were identified but at the expense of specificity. Thus, the same effect could be achieved by using a less stringent T-score for the diagnosis of osteoporosis. CONCLUSIONS: Since taking the minimum value of the two measurements does not improve predictive ability, its clinical utility for the diagnosis of osteoporosis is low.

Page Manager: Webmaster|Last update: 9/11/2012
Share:

The University of Gothenburg uses cookies to provide you with the best possible user experience. By continuing on this website, you approve of our use of cookies.  What are cookies?