To the top

Page Manager: Webmaster
Last update: 9/11/2012 3:13 PM

Tell a friend about this page
Print version

Energy Expenditure by Mul… - University of Gothenburg, Sweden Till startsida
Sitemap
To content Read more about how we use cookies on gu.se

Energy Expenditure by Multisensor Armband in Overweight and Obese Lactating Women Validated by Doubly Labeled Water

Journal article
Authors Frode Slinde
Fredrik Bertz
Anna Winkvist
Lars Ellegård
Håkan Olausson
Hilde Kristin Brekke
Published in Obesity
Volume 21
Issue 11
Pages 2231-2235
ISSN 1930-7381
Publication year 2013
Published at Institute of Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine and Clinical Nutrition
Pages 2231-2235
Language en
Links dx.doi.org/10.1002/oby.20363
Keywords PHYSICAL-ACTIVITY, WEIGHT, ADULTS, PREGNANCY, VALIDITY, MONITORS, CHILDREN
Subject categories Endocrinology and Diabetes

Abstract

Objective: To validate total energy expenditure (TEE) and activity energy expenditure (AEE) from the portable SenseWear armband (SWA) Pro 2 (TEESWA and AEE(SWA); InnerView software versions SWA 5.1 and SWA 6.1) against TEE from doubly labeled water (DLW) and AEE from DLW and indirect calorimetry (TEEDLW and AEE(DLW)) in overweight/obese lactating women at 10 weeks postpartum. Design and Methods: TEE was measured simultaneously with DLW (14 days) and SWA (first 7 days). Lactating women (n = 62), non-smoking, with a BMI > 25 kg/m(2) and wearing time SWA >= 90% were included. Results: Mean TEESWA5.1 was overestimated with 85 kcal/day compared to TEEDLW (P = 0.040), while mean TEESWA6.1 was underestimated with 241 kcal/day compared to TEEDLW (P < 0.001). Mean AEE(SWA5.1) was similar to mean AEE(DLW) (P = 0.818), while mean AEE(SWA6.1) was underestimated with 581 kcal/day compared to AEE(DLW) (P < 0.001). TEESWA6.1 and AEE(SWA6.1) were systematically underestimated at higher levels of energy expenditure and BMI while only AEE(SWA5.1) was systematically overestimated at higher levels of energy expenditure. Conclusions: TEESWA5.1 and AEE(SWA5.1) were fairly estimated on a group level while TEESWA6.1 and AEE(SWA6.1) were significantly and systematically underestimated. Both SWA software versions showed large individual variation in agreement with TEEDLW and AEE(DLW), limiting the validity on individual level.

Page Manager: Webmaster|Last update: 9/11/2012
Share:

The University of Gothenburg uses cookies to provide you with the best possible user experience. By continuing on this website, you approve of our use of cookies.  What are cookies?