To the top

Page Manager: Webmaster
Last update: 9/11/2012 3:13 PM

Tell a friend about this page
Print version

Implementation of Person … - University of Gothenburg, Sweden Till startsida
Sitemap
To content Read more about how we use cookies on gu.se

Implementation of Person Centered Care: Management Perspective

Journal article
Authors Tariq Alharbi
Eric Carlström
Inger Ekman
Lars-Eric Olsson
Published in Journal of Hospital Administration
Volume 3
Issue 3
Pages 107-120
ISSN 1927-6990
Publication year 2014
Published at University of Gothenburg Centre for person-centred care (GPCC)
Institute of Health and Care Sciences
Pages 107-120
Language en
Links dx.doi.org/10.5430/jha.v3n3p107
Subject categories Other Social Sciences

Abstract

Objective: In this study the implementation of a care model was examined in a public hospital in Sweden. The aim was to identify, from the management perspective, barriers and facilitators with respect to the implementation. A further aim was to study the explanatory power of a theoretical framework, normalization process theory (NPT). Method: Semi-structured interviews were conducted with all of the members of a hospital departments’ managerial group. Interview transcripts were analysed by means of directed deductive content analysis, applying NPT as theoretical frame work. Results: The respondents identified factors, which were perceived as facilitating or obstructing the implementation process. These factors were; organizational culture, distribution of power, patient characteristics, resistance to change, teamwork, efficiency, time and speed of implementation. The theoretical framework, NPT, was partly supported by the data. There was however an absence of collective action and reflexive monitoring constructs. Conclusion: The implementation process, according to NPT, was incomplete and there was a risk that it could regress to the previous work routines. However, implementation theories, including NPT, do not have a timeframe for the implementation process. Even though theories are able of describing in detail the steps for successfully embedding and sustaining an innovation, they do not describe or identify factors influencing the speed of the implementation. A possible reason might be that time is a subjective factor.

Page Manager: Webmaster|Last update: 9/11/2012
Share:

The University of Gothenburg uses cookies to provide you with the best possible user experience. By continuing on this website, you approve of our use of cookies.  What are cookies?