To the top

Page Manager: Webmaster
Last update: 9/11/2012 3:13 PM

Tell a friend about this page
Print version

In Vitro and Ex Vivo Eval… - University of Gothenburg, Sweden Till startsida
To content Read more about how we use cookies on

In Vitro and Ex Vivo Evaluation of a Novel Guided Drill System for Bone-Anchored Hearing Implants

Journal article
Authors Martin L Johansson
T. Eriksson
Omar Omar
Published in International Journal of Oral & Maxillofacial Implants
Volume 34
Issue 6
Pages E85-E98
ISSN 0882-2786
Publication year 2019
Published at Institute of Clinical Sciences, Department of Biomaterials
Pages E85-E98
Language en
Keywords BAHS, bone drilling, bone-anchored hearing system, bone-anchored, prosthesis, drill mechanics, flapless procedure, guide, heat generation, osteotomy, surgical guide, surgical procedure, heat-generation, site preparation, artificial bone, cortical bone, surgery, temperatures, single, force, Dentistry, Oral Surgery & Medicine
Subject categories Dentistry


Purpose: The aim of this study was to evaluate a new guided drill system (MIPS) for placement of boneanchored hearing systems (BAHS) with respect to cutting performance, generation of heat, and distortion of the bone during drilling and compare it with a conventional drill system (Ponto). Further, the role of irrigation and drilling procedure with respect to the degree of heat generation was evaluated. Materials and Methods: Compact artificial bone was subjected to each drill in the two systems (conventional vs guided) while measuring thrust force, torque, and temperature. The temperature changes, induced during different drilling procedures, were measured by thermocouples positioned 0.5 mm from the periphery of the drill tract. The degree of bone damage was evaluated histologically after drilling in bovine, compact, tibial bone. Results: The mean thrust energy was significantly lower for the drills of the guided system compared with the corresponding conventional drills. In contrast, the mean torque energy was higher using the guided system but only for the initial guide drilling step. Whereas twist drills in combination with a guided drilling approach (MIPS) generated relatively more heat, especially during a prolonged drilling sequence, it was more forgiving in the case of impaired irrigation. The histologic evaluation showed relatively more even cut surfaces and fewer microcracks in the osteotomy wall using the guided system compared with the conventional system. Conclusion: Provided the clinically recommended drilling procedure was adhered to, the absolute temperatures using either a conventional drill system or a guided drill system were below the threshold for thermally induced tissue damage. This study suggests that the guided MIPS system conveys a promising design for an efficient and still-safe osteotomy site preparation for BAHS placement.

Page Manager: Webmaster|Last update: 9/11/2012

The University of Gothenburg uses cookies to provide you with the best possible user experience. By continuing on this website, you approve of our use of cookies.  What are cookies?