Till sidans topp

Sidansvarig: Webbredaktion
Sidan uppdaterades: 2012-09-11 15:12

Tipsa en vän
Utskriftsversion

(Re-)Interpreting Fiducia… - Göteborgs universitet Till startsida
Webbkarta
Till innehåll Läs mer om hur kakor används på gu.se

(Re-)Interpreting Fiduciary Duty to Justify Socially Responsible Investment for Pension Funds?

Artikel i vetenskaplig tidskrift
Författare Joakim Sandberg
Publicerad i Corporate governance: An International Review
Volym 21
Nummer/häfte 5
Sidor 436-446
ISSN 0964-8410
Publiceringsår 2013
Publicerad vid Institutionen för filosofi, lingvistik och vetenskapsteori
Sidor 436-446
Språk en
Länkar dx.doi.org/10.1111/corg.12028
Ämnesord Corporate Governance;Institutional Shareholder;Legal Origins and Control;Ownership Mechanisms;Pension Fund Ownership
Ämneskategorier Företagsekonomi, Finansrätt

Sammanfattning

Research Issue A critical issue for the future growth of socially responsible investment (SRI) is to what extent institutional investors such as pension funds can be persuaded to engage in it. This paper considers attempts at justifying such engagement stemming from a range of (re-)interpretations of the fiduciary duties owed by pension funds to their beneficiaries, and thereby develops a hypothesis concerning the most effective political or legal remedy. Research Findings Previous commentary suggests that fiduciary duty either already mandates SRI for pension funds, or at least can be made to do so rather easily. In contrast with this, however, this paper finds that none of the considered interpretations is able to justify engagement on social and environmental issues across the board. Indeed, the problem to some extent seems rooted in the very concept of fiduciary duty. Theoretical Implications The paper is relevant to current attempts at justifying SRI through reinterpretations of fiduciary duty, provided mainly by legal scholars and practitioners. By addressing the more philosophical issue of how far the concept of fiduciary duty can be “stretched” to accommodate SRI (a project of conceptual rather than legal clarification), it provides an evaluation of the contemporary debate which is independent of squabbles about existing law. Policy Implications The paper shows that there are conceptual limits to attempts at redefining fiduciary duty. But this does not mean that pension funds' engagement in SRI is unjustified or unjustifiable more generally. A more promising way to legally mandate SRI may be through what is dubbed independent social and environmental obligations.

Sidansvarig: Webbredaktion|Sidan uppdaterades: 2012-09-11
Dela:

På Göteborgs universitet använder vi kakor (cookies) för att webbplatsen ska fungera på ett bra sätt för dig. Genom att surfa vidare godkänner du att vi använder kakor.  Vad är kakor?