Till sidans topp

Sidansvarig: Webbredaktion
Sidan uppdaterades: 2012-09-11 15:12

Tipsa en vän
Utskriftsversion

Effectiveness of person-c… - Göteborgs universitet Till startsida
Webbkarta
Till innehåll Läs mer om hur kakor används på gu.se

Effectiveness of person-centred care after acute coronary syndrome in relation to educational level: Subgroup analysis of a two-armed randomised controlled trial

Artikel i vetenskaplig tidskrift
Författare Andreas Fors
Hanna Gyllensten
Karl Swedberg
Inger Ekman
Publicerad i International journal of cardiology
Volym 221
Sidor 957-962
ISSN 0167-5273
Publiceringsår 2016
Publicerad vid Centrum för personcentrerad vård vid Göteborgs universitet (GPCC)
Institutionen för vårdvetenskap och hälsa
Institutionen för medicin, avdelningen för molekylär och klinisk medicin
Sidor 957-962
Språk en
Länkar dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijcard.2016.07...
Ämneskategorier Klinisk medicin

Sammanfattning

AIM: The aim of this study was to evaluate the effects of person-centred care (PCC) after acute coronary syndrome (ACS) in relation to educational level of participants. METHOD: 199 Patients <75years with ACS were randomised to PCC plus usual care or usual care alone and followed for 6months from hospital to outpatient care and primary care. For the PCC group, patients and health care professionals co-created a PCC health plan reflecting both perspectives, which induced a continued collaboration in person-centred teams at each health care level. A composite score of changes that included general self-efficacy assessment, return to work or previous activity level, re-hospitalisation or death was used as outcome measure. RESULTS: In the group of patients without postsecondary education (n=90) the composite score showed a significant improvement in favour of the PCC intervention (n=40) vs. usual care (n=50) at six months (35.0%, n=14 vs. 16.0%, n=8; odds ratio (OR)=2.8, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.0-7.7, P=0.041). In patients with postsecondary education (n=109), a non-significant difference in favour of the PCC intervention (n=54) vs. usual care (n=55) was observed in the composite score (13.0%, n=7 vs 3.6%, n=2; OR=3.9, 95% CI: 0.8-19.9, P=0.097). CONCLUSION: A PCC approach, which stresses the necessity of a patient-health care professional partnership, is beneficial in patients with low education after an ACS event. Because these patients have been identified as a vulnerable group in cardiac rehabilitation, we suggest that PCC can be integrated into conventional cardiac rehabilitation programmes to improve both equity in uptake and health outcomes. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Swedish registry, Researchweb.org, ID NR 65 791.

Sidansvarig: Webbredaktion|Sidan uppdaterades: 2012-09-11
Dela:

På Göteborgs universitet använder vi kakor (cookies) för att webbplatsen ska fungera på ett bra sätt för dig. Genom att surfa vidare godkänner du att vi använder kakor.  Vad är kakor?