Till sidans topp

Sidansvarig: Webbredaktion
Sidan uppdaterades: 2012-09-11 15:12

Tipsa en vän
Utskriftsversion

The evolution of intellec… - Göteborgs universitet Till startsida
Webbkarta
Till innehåll Läs mer om hur kakor används på gu.se

The evolution of intellectual property strategy in innovation ecosystems: Uncovering complementary and substitute appropriability regimes

Artikel i vetenskaplig tidskrift
Författare Marcus J Holgersson
Ove Granstrand
Marcel Bogers
Publicerad i Long range planning
Volym 51
Nummer/häfte 2
Sidor 303-319
ISSN 0024-6301
Publiceringsår 2018
Publicerad vid Institutionen för matematiska vetenskaper
Sidor 303-319
Språk en
Länkar https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lrp.2017....
https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers...
Ämnesord Appropriation, Innovation ecosystem, Intellectual property right, Litigation, Open innovation, Patent, Technology licensing
Ämneskategorier Elektroteknik och elektronik, Telekommunikation, Ekonomi och näringsliv, Företagsekonomi, Juridik, Immaterialrätt, Informationsteknik

Sammanfattning

In this article, we attempt to extend and nuance the debate on intellectual property (IP) strategy, appropriation, and open innovation in dynamic and systemic innovation contexts. We present the case of four generations of mobile telecommunications systems (covering the period 1980-2015), and describe and analyze the co-evolution of strategic IP management and innovation ecosystems. Throughout this development, technologies and technological relationships were governed with different and shifting degrees of formality. Simultaneously, firms differentiated technology accessibility across actors and technologies to benefit from openness and appropriation of innovation. Our analysis shows that the discussion of competitiveness and appropriability needs to be expanded from the focal appropriability regime and complementary assets to the larger context of the innovation ecosystem and its cooperative and competitive actor relations, with dispersed complementary and substitute assets and technologies. Consequently, the shaping of complementary and substitute appropriability regimes is central when strategizing in dynamic and systemic innovation contexts. This holds important implications for the management of open innovation, innovation ecosystems, platforms, and coopetition.

Sidansvarig: Webbredaktion|Sidan uppdaterades: 2012-09-11
Dela:

På Göteborgs universitet använder vi kakor (cookies) för att webbplatsen ska fungera på ett bra sätt för dig. Genom att surfa vidare godkänner du att vi använder kakor.  Vad är kakor?