Till sidans topp

Sidansvarig: Webbredaktion
Sidan uppdaterades: 2012-09-11 15:12

Tipsa en vän
Utskriftsversion

Effects of person-centred… - Göteborgs universitet Till startsida
Webbkarta
Till innehåll Läs mer om hur kakor används på gu.se

Effects of person-centred care after an event of acute coronary syndrome: Two-year follow-up of a randomised controlled trial

Artikel i vetenskaplig tidskrift
Författare Andreas Fors
Karl Swedberg
Kerstin Ulin
Axel Wolf
Inger Ekman
Publicerad i International Journal of Cardiology
Volym 249
Sidor 42-47
ISSN 0167-5273
Publiceringsår 2017
Publicerad vid Centrum för personcentrerad vård vid Göteborgs universitet (GPCC)
Institutionen för vårdvetenskap och hälsa
Institutionen för medicin, avdelningen för molekylär och klinisk medicin
Sidor 42-47
Språk en
Länkar doi.org/10.1016/j.ijcard.2017.08.06...
Ämnesord Acute coronary syndrome, Cardiac rehabilitation, Patient-centered care, Person-centred care, Randomised controlled trial, Self-efficacy
Ämneskategorier Klinisk medicin, Annan medicin och hälsovetenskap

Sammanfattning

© 2017 The Authors. Aim: To assess the long-term effect of person-centred care (PCC) in patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS). Method: Patients with ACS were randomly assigned to treatment as usual (control group) or an added PCC intervention for six months. The primary endpoint was a composite score of changes in general self-efficacy. ≥. five units, return to work or to a prior activity level and re-hospitalisation or death. Results: The composite score improved in the PCC intervention group (n = 94) at a two-year follow-up compared with the control group (n = 105) (18.1%, n = 17 vs. 10.5%, n = 11; P = 0.127). In the per-protocol analysis (n = 183) the improvement was significant in favour of the PCC intervention (n = 78) compared with usual care (n = 105) (21.8%, n = 17 vs. 10.5%, n = 11; P = 0.039). This effect was driven by the finding that more patients in the PCC group improved their general self-efficacy score. ≥. 5. units (32.2%, n = 19 vs. 17.3%, n = 14; P = 0.046). The composite score improvement was significantly higher in the PCC intervention group without post-secondary education (n = 33) in comparison with corresponding patients in the control group (n = 50) (30.3%, n = 10 vs. 10.0%, n = 5; P = 0.024). Conclusion: Implementation of PCC results in sustained improvements in health outcome in patients with ACS. PCC can be incorporated into conventional cardiac prevention programmes to improve equity in uptake and patient health outcomes. Trial registration: Swedish registry, Researchweb.org, ID NR 65791.

Sidansvarig: Webbredaktion|Sidan uppdaterades: 2012-09-11
Dela:

På Göteborgs universitet använder vi kakor (cookies) för att webbplatsen ska fungera på ett bra sätt för dig. Genom att surfa vidare godkänner du att vi använder kakor.  Vad är kakor?