Till sidans topp

Sidansvarig: Webbredaktion
Sidan uppdaterades: 2012-09-11 15:12

Tipsa en vän
Utskriftsversion

Improving economic evalua… - Göteborgs universitet Till startsida
Webbkarta
Till innehåll Läs mer om hur kakor används på gu.se

Improving economic evaluations in stroke: A report from the ESO Health Economics Working Group

Artikel i vetenskaplig tidskrift
Författare D. A. Cadilhac
J. Kim
A. Wilsno
E. Berge
A. Patel
M. Ali
J. Saver
H. Christensen
M. Cuche
S. Crews
O. Wu
M. Provoyeur
P. McMeekin
I. Durand-Zaleski
G. A. Ford
N. Muhlemann
P. M. Bath
A. H. Abdul-Rahim
Katharina S Sunnerhagen
A. Meretoja
V. Thijs
C. Weimar
A. Massaro
A. Ranta
K. R. Lees
Publicerad i European Stroke Journal
Sidor 9
ISSN 2396-9873
Publiceringsår 2020
Publicerad vid Institutionen för neurovetenskap och fysiologi
Sidor 9
Språk en
Länkar dx.doi.org/10.1177/2396987319897466
Ämnesord Stroke, economic evaluation, health policy, health outcomes, modified, Rankin Scale, EuroQol, costs, scale, rehabilitation, instrument, trials, Neurosciences & Neurology
Ämneskategorier Neurologi, Folkhälsovetenskap, global hälsa, socialmedicin och epidemiologi

Sammanfattning

Introduction Approaches to economic evaluations of stroke therapies are varied and inconsistently described. An objective of the European Stroke Organisation (ESO) Health Economics Working Group is to standardise and improve the economic evaluations of interventions for stroke. Methods The ESO Health Economics Working Group and additional experts were contacted to develop a protocol and a guidance document for data collection for economic evaluations of stroke therapies. A modified Delphi approach, including a survey and consensus processes, was used to agree on content. We also asked the participants about resources that could be shared to improve economic evaluations of interventions for stroke. Results Of 28 experts invited, 16 (57%) completed the initial survey, with representation from universities, government, and industry. More than half of the survey respondents endorsed 13 specific items to include in a standard resource use questionnaire. Preferred functional/quality of life outcome measures to use for economic evaluations were the modified Rankin Scale (14 respondents, 88%) and the EQ-5D instrument (11 respondents, 69%). Of the 12 respondents who had access to data used in economic evaluations, 10 (83%) indicated a willingness to share data. A protocol template and a guidance document for data collection were developed and are presented in this article. Conclusion The protocol template and guidance document for data collection will support a more standardised and transparent approach for economic evaluations of stroke care.

Sidansvarig: Webbredaktion|Sidan uppdaterades: 2012-09-11
Dela:

På Göteborgs universitet använder vi kakor (cookies) för att webbplatsen ska fungera på ett bra sätt för dig. Genom att surfa vidare godkänner du att vi använder kakor.  Vad är kakor?