Till sidans topp

Sidansvarig: Webbredaktion
Sidan uppdaterades: 2012-09-11 15:12

Tipsa en vän
Utskriftsversion

Correspondence Between th… - Göteborgs universitet Till startsida
Webbkarta
Till innehåll Läs mer om hur kakor används på gu.se

Correspondence Between the Neuropsychiatric Interview M.I.N.I. and the BDI-II and MADRS-S Self-Rating Instruments as Diagnostic Tools in Primary Care Patients with Depression

Artikel i vetenskaplig tidskrift
Författare Shabnam Nejati
Nashmil Ariai
Cecilia Björkelund
Ingmarie Skoglund
Eva-Lisa Petersson
P. Augustsson
Dominique Hange
Irene Svenningsson
Publicerad i International Journal of General Medicine
Volym 13
Sidor 177-183
ISSN 1178-7074
Publiceringsår 2020
Publicerad vid Institutionen för medicin, avdelningen för samhällsmedicin och folkhälsa
Sidor 177-183
Språk en
Länkar dx.doi.org/10.2147/ijgm.S243150
Ämnesord depression, diagnostic instrument, primary care, self-assessment, instrument, dsm-iv, scale, inventory, anxiety, prevalence, version, mini, General & Internal Medicine
Ämneskategorier Allmän medicin

Sammanfattning

Objective: To investigate the correspondence between the diagnoses received by patients with symptoms of common mental disorder attending primary care, based on the diagnostic instrument International Neuropsychiatric Interview (M.I.N.I.) and the self-assessment instruments such as Beck Depression Inventory (BDI-II) and Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale - self-rating version (MADRS-S), respectively. Design: Data were collected from a prospective observational study, ADAS, between 2014 and 2015. Setting: Twenty-eight primary care centers in Region Vastra Gotaland, Sweden. Patients: A total of 192 patients, 18-60 years of age, on sick leave >= 14 days, with mild/moderate depression, anxiety syndrome, and stress-related mental illness were included. Main Outcome Measures: Scores of the assessment instruments (BDI-II and MADRS-S) on inclusion, sensitivity, specificity, positive (PPV) and negative predictive value (NPV) for BDI-II and MADRS-S, respectively, with M.I.N.I used as diagnostic instrument. Results: Using M.I.N.I. as gold standard, the BDI-II and MADRS-S showed almost the same sensitivity (86.9% and 87.4%, respectively), but specificity for MADRS-S was doubled compared to BDI-II (36% and 18%, respectively). There was a significant association between MADRS-S and M.I.N.I. (p=0.027). However, the same analysis between BDI and M.I.N.I. was not statistically significant (p=0.635). NPV and PPV were calculated from assumed prevalences (10% and 75%) and were higher for MADRS-S compared to BDI-II. The PPV differences were between 2% and 7% and NPV differences were between 3% and 19%. Conclusion: With M.I.N.I. as gold standard, MADRS-S performs better than BDI-II as a self-assessment tool in the primary care context for depression diagnostics.

Sidansvarig: Webbredaktion|Sidan uppdaterades: 2012-09-11
Dela:

På Göteborgs universitet använder vi kakor (cookies) för att webbplatsen ska fungera på ett bra sätt för dig. Genom att surfa vidare godkänner du att vi använder kakor.  Vad är kakor?