Syllabus

Digitalisering och styrning

Course
FEK211
First cycle
15 credits (ECTS)

About the Syllabus

Registration number
GU 2024/1573
Date of entry into force
2024-09-02
Decision date
2024-05-30
Valid from semester
Autumn semester 2024
Decision maker
Department of Business Administration

Course modules

Digitalization and Management, Exam, 5 Credits
Digitalization and Management, Project Work, 2.5 Credits
Logistics, Exam, 4.5 Credits
Logistics, Case Studies, 2 Credits
Logistics, Laboratory Sessions, 1 Credits
Data-Driven Decision-Making, Exam, 3.5 Credits
Data-Driven Decision-Making, Case Studies, 3 Credits
Data-Driven Decision-Making, Laboratory Sessions, 1 Credits

Position

The course is offered as a freestanding course.

The course can be part of the following programme: 1) Bachelor's Programme in Business and Economics (S1EKA)

Entry requirements

Admission to the course requires the student to have completed FEK101 Business Administration, Organization and Leadership, 7.5 credits, FEK102 Business Administration, Marketing, 7.5 credits, FEK103 Business Administration, Financial Accounting, 7.5 credits and FEK104 Business Administration, Management Accounting, 7.5 credits or FEG100 Business Administration 1, 30 credits, or equivalent.

Content

The course Digitalization and Management, 15 credits, consists of two sub-courses. The first sub-course is more general and deals with how digitalization affects organizations and their governance. The sub-course is studied by all students. The second sub-course consists of a choice between two specific areas of application: logistics or data-driven decision-making.

• Sub-course 1 Digitalization and Management, 7.5 credits.
The student chooses one of the following sub-courses:
• Sub-course 2 Logistics, 7.5 credits
• Sub-course 3 Data-Driven Decision-Making, 7.5 credits

The sub-courses include various activities and components such as guest lectures by professionals from trade and industry, study visits to companies or workplaces, and laboratory sessions. The course also addresses topics related to sustainable development and ethical considerations in information systems.

Sub-courses
1. Digitalization and Management (Digitalisering och styrning), 7.5 credits
Grading scale: Excellent (A), Very good (B), Good (C), Satisfactory (D), Sufficient (E) and Fail (F)


Content
The sub-course combines theoretical and practical aspects to provide students with a comprehensive understanding of information systems. The theoretical component aims to familiarize students with the concept and functioning of information systems, as well as the challenges they pose in organizational contexts. Additionally, it explores the impact of digitalization on companies and organizations, the significance of technological development for strategic management, and the industry transformations resulting from increased digitalization.
The practical component involves hands-on exercises where students engage with market-leading information systems to acquire fundamental operational skills. They will also be introduced to simplified predictive analysis techniques and participate in a group assignment focusing on the influence of digitalization and digital technologies on contemporary companies and organizations. Through the application of these tools, students have the opportunity to put theoretical knowledge into practice.

Learning outcomes
On successful completion of the sub-course, students should be able to:

  1. Explain what is meant by an information system and how digitalization and technological development lead to changes in the strategy and management of organizations.
  2. Explain and provide examples of essential aspects that need to be considered when making information system-related investments.
  3. Show basic knowledge of using information systems and predictive analysis to solve work tasks performed within an organization.
  4. Critically relate to concepts and current issues discussed in the course.

Form of teaching
Lectures, guest lectures, seminars, and laboratory sessions.


Assessment
Learning outcomes 1 and 2 are examined through an individual written exam.
Learning outcome 3 is examined through a project work that is carried out in a group.
Learning outcome 4 is examined through the written exam, the project work and seminars.
Due to resource constraints, the project work can only be performed and assessed within the course dates.


Grades
Grading scale: Excellent (A), Very good (B), Good (C), Satisfactory (D), Sufficient (E) and Fail (F).
To pass the sub-course, a student must have achieved all learning outcomes. This means a passing grade (A-E) on the individual written exam, a passing grade (A-E) for the project work and pass on the seminars (G). Points on the individual written exam and the project work are added together and translated into grade A-F for the sub-course.



2. Logistics (Logistik), 7.5 credits
Grading scale: Excellent (A), Very good (B), Good (C), Satisfactory (D), Sufficient (E) and Fail (F)


Content
The sub-course provides an overview of possible applications of information technology (IT) in the field of logistics. A number of the applications are studied in more detail.


Learning outcomes
On successful completion of the sub-course, students should be able to:

  1. Describe and explain: basic terminology and concepts in the IT field; central applications of IT support in the logistics field; and, how these applications can contribute to creating value in an organisation.
  2. Describe and exemplify how IT support in the field of logistics can contribute to creating value in an organisation.
  3. Conduct basic exercises in a selection of IT-support tools within the logistics area.
  4. Analyse and assess (starting from relevant theory) ethical aspects of information systems.


Form of teaching

Lectures, seminars, study visits and laboratory sessions.


Assessment

Learning outcome 1 is examined via an individual written exam.
Learning outcome 2 is examined via one project work, which is carried out in a group and is presented orally and in writing.
Learning outcome 3 is examined via two laboratory sessions.
Learning outcome 4 is examined via the written exam and the project work.


During the course, there may be lectures by visiting speakers and laboratory sessions where attendance is compulsory. A student who does not participate needs to complete a special make-up assignment within the prescribed time.


Due to resource constraints, project work and laboratory sessions can only be performed and assessed within the course dates.


Grades
Grading scale: Excellent (A), Very good (B), Good (C), Satisfactory (D), Sufficient (E) and Fail (F).
To pass the sub-course, a student must have achieved all learning outcomes. This means a passing grade (A-E) on the individual written exam and Pass (G) in all laboratory sessions and project work. The compulsory elements of the sub-course must also be completed. Points on the written exam and the project work are added together and translated to grade A-F for the sub-course.


3. Data-Driven Decision-Making (Datadrivet beslutsfattande), 7.5 credits
Grading scale: Excellent (A), Very good (B), Good (C), Satisfactory (D), Sufficient (E) and Fail (F)


Content
The sub-course consists of two parts, a theoretical and a practical one. The theoretical part begins with an overview of alternative models regarding decisionmaking in relation to management accounting. This part concludes with a review of models for data-driven decision-making. The purpose of the theoretical overview is to better understand the processes involved in decision-making within organizations.


The practical part starts with the student getting familiarized with digital decisionmaking systems and solving a simpler task. The student then works on a more complex task that forms the basis for data-driven decision-making. The purpose of the practical part is for the student to independently carry out work based on the analysis of relevant data to improve precision and efficiency in decision-making by using data insights, trends, and patterns.


Learning outcomes
On successful completion of the sub-course, students should be able to:

  1. Explain orally and in writing relevant aspects regarding decision support systems, decision-making, and data-driven decision-making.
  2. Use a decision support system to solve a simpler task within an organization.
  3. Conduct data analysis in order to produce a basis for data-driven decisions.
  4. Critically relate to definitions and current issues discussed in the course.


Form of teaching

Lectures, guest lectures, seminars, laboratory sessions and project supervision.


Assessment
Learning outcome 1 is examined through an individual written exam and a project work that is carried out in a group.
Learning outcome 2 is examined through two laboratory sessions.
Learning outcome 3 is examined through the project work.
Learning outcome 4 is examined through the written exam, the project work and seminars.


All students must be individually prepared to present a solution in relation to the project work at the examining seminar.


Guest lectures and laboratory sessions with attendance requirements may occur during the course. A student who does not participate needs to complete a special make-up assignment within the prescribed time.

Due to resource constraints, project work and laboratory sessions can only be performed and assessed within the course dates.

Grades
Grading scale: Excellent (A), Very good (B), Good (C), Satisfactory (D), Sufficient (E) and Fail (F).
To pass the sub-course, a student must have achieved all learning outcomes. This means a passing grade (A-E) on the individual written exam, a passing grade (A-E) for the project work and Pass (G) for laboratory sessions and seminar work. The compulsory elements of the sub-course must also be completed. Points on the written exam and the project work are added together and translated into grade A-F for the sub-course.

Objectives

For each sub-course, learning outcomes are stated under "Content".

Sustainability labelling

No sustainability labelling.

Form of teaching

See “Content” (above) for each sub-course.

Language of instruction: Swedish
Teaching in English may occur.

Examination formats

See each sub-course.


If a student who has twice received a failing grade for the same examination component wishes to change examiner ahead of the next examination session, such a request should be made to the department in writing and should be approved by the department unless there are special reasons to the contrary (Chapter 6 Section 22 of the Higher Education Ordinance).


If a student has received a recommendation from the University of Gothenburg for study support for students with disabilities, the examiner may, where it is compatible with the learning outcomes of the course and provided that no unreasonable resources are required, decide to allow the student to sit an adjusted exam or alternative form of assessment.


In the event that a course has ceased or undergone major changes, students are to be guaranteed at least three examination sessions (including the ordinary examination session) over a period of at least one year, but no more than two years after the course has ceased/been changed. The same applies to internships and professional placements (VFU), although this is restricted to just one additional examination session.

Grades

The grading scale comprises: Excellent (A), Very good (B), Good (C), Satisfactory (D), Sufficient (E) and Fail (F).

A passing grade for sub-course 1 in combination with a passing grade in the selected application course is required for a passing course grade. Points from graded examination elements in each sub-course are added up and translated into a course grade.


Grade (Definition) Characteristic:
A (Excellent) A distinguished result that is excellent with regard to theoretical depth, practical relevance, analytical ability and independent thought.

B (Very good) A very good result with regard to theoretical depth, practical relevance, analytical ability and independent thought.

C (Good) The result is of a good standard with regard to theoretical depth, practical relevance, analytical ability and independent thought and lives up to expectations.

D (Satisfactory) The result is of a satisfactory standard with regard to theoretical depth, practical relevance, analytical ability and independent thought.

E (Sufficient) The result satisfies the minimum requirements with regard to theoretical depth, practical relevance, analytical ability and independent thought, but not more.

F (Fail) The result does not meet the minimum requirements with regard to theoretical depth, practical relevance, analytical ability and independent thought.


Some occasional examination elements of the course may have the grading scale UG (Fail/Pass).

Course evaluation

A course evaluation is conducted anonymously either digitally via the course website or via a written questionnaire handed out at the last scheduled meeting of the course or in connection with the exam. The results of the evaluation are to be communicated to students via the course meeting and course website.
The results of and possible changes to the course will be shared with students who participated in the evaluation and students who are starting the course.

Other regulations

The course cannot be part of the 90 credits (with successive specialisations) that is required in the Degree of Bachelor in business administration main field of study.