Research methods in teaching and learning in higher education
Vetenskapliga metoder för högskolepedagogik
About the Reading list
Bacchi, C. (2012). Why Study Problematizations? Making Politics Visible. Open Journal of Political Science, 2(1), 1–8. (8 pages) http://dx.doi.org/10.4236/ojps.2012.21001
Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. David. (2023). Research design : qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (Sixth edition). SAGE[MO1] . (320 pages)
Dafouz, E., & Smit, U. (2022). Towards multilingualism in English-medium higher education. Journal of English-Medium Instruction, 1(1), 29–47. (18 pages) https://www-jbe-platform- com.ezproxy.ub.gu.se/docserver/fulltext/jemi.21018.daf.pdf?expires=16915879 68&id=id&accname=goteborgsswe%2F6&checksum=946BC60D72A874A717922 BBADD38FB70
Daniel, B. K., & Harland, T. (2017). Higher education research methodology: A step-by-step guide to the research process. Routledge. (154 pages). https://www-taylorfrancis- com.ezproxy.ub.gu.se/books/mono/10.4324/9781315149783/higher-education- research-methodology-ben-kei-daniel-tony-harland
Esterhazy, R., & Damşa, C. (2019). Unpacking the feedback process: an analysis of undergraduate students’ interactional meaning-making of feedback comments. Studies in Higher Education, 44(2), 260–274. (14 pages) https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2017.1359249
Filippou, K., Kallo, J., & Mikkilä-Erdmann, M. (2017). Students’ views on thesis supervision in International master’s degree programmes in Finnish Universities. Intercultural Education, 28(3), 334–352. (19 pages) https://doi.org/10.1080/14675986.2017.1333713
Hessler, M., Pöpping, D., Hollstein, H., Ohlenburg, H., Arnemann, P., Massoth, C., Seidel, L.M., Zarbock, A. & Wenk, M. (2018). Availability of cookies during an academic course session affects the evaluation of teaching. Medical Education, 52(10), 1064-1072. (9 pages) https://doi.org/10.1111/medu.13627
Huisman, B., Saab, N., Van Driel, J., & Van Den Broek, P. (2018). Peer feedback on academic writing: undergraduate students’ peer feedback role, peer feedback perceptions and essay performance. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 43(6), 955-968. (14 pages)
Linderoth, C., Hultén, M., & Stenliden, L. (2024). Competing visions of artificial intelligence in education - A heuristic analysis on sociotechnical imaginaries and problematizations in policy guidelines. Policy Futures in Education, 22(8), 1662–1678. (17 pages) https://doi.org/10.1177/14782103241228900
Little, T., Dawson, P., Boud, D., & Tai, J. (2023). Can students' feedback literacy be improved? A scoping review of interventions. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education. 1-14. Online, ahead-of-print, 1–14. (14 pages) https://www- tandfonline-com.ezproxy.ub.gu.se/doi/full/10.1080/02602938.2023.2177613
Mihut, G. (2024). Learning from each other: Comparing the experiences of first-generation migrant, international, and domestic students at Irish universities. Journal of Studies in International Education, 28(1), 15-32. (18 pages) https://doi.org/10.1177/10283153221121397
Nieminen, J.H., & Carless, D. (2023) Feedback literacy: a critical review of an emerging concept. Higher Education, 85, 1381–1400. (20 pages) https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-022-00895-9
Ou, A., & Malmström, H. (2023). 'It becomes increasingly complex to deal with multiple channels': Materialised communicative competence and digital inequality in Engh-medium higher education in the digital era. Journal of Multilingual a Multicultural Development, 1–19. (19 pages). https://www-tandfonline-com.ezproxy.ub.gu.se/doi/pdf/10.1080/01434632.2023.2222102?download=tru